FarmingCourses | Data Farming
Subscribe Customers

Serious first-principles model

Aerial's Economics of Hybrid Orbital-Terrestrial Data Farming

A parameterized model for a system where GPU drones run autonomy and inference, fishpond hubs supply liquid-cooled ground compute, and sun-synchronous LEO nodes exploit radiative heat rejection and high sunlight fraction.

What this is
A sensitivity tool to stress test economics and physics.
What this is not
A guarantee of performance without site-specific engineering.
Master KPI
$/useful MW-month (useful compute, not nameplate).
Shareable URL parameters Compute + cooling + comms + orbit Audit-friendly assumptions

Thesis in one line

We win if GPUs stay utilized, cooling stays stable, the link budget is honest, and orbital mass is justified by compute value produced each month.

What this model is (and is not)

This is a sensitivity tool to test whether the hybrid farm-to-orbit story is coherent under realistic constraints: power, cooling, comms, mass to orbit, and utilization. Trust the relationships, not the absolute numbers. Site-specific engineering still rules.

Why hybrid at all

Bandwidth is limited, eclipses happen, radiators cost mass, downlinks are weather sensitive, and autonomy on farms still needs low latency. The hybrid split keeps drones on autonomy, hubs on bulk inference and caching, and LEO on compute windows where radiative rejection and sunlight fraction pay off.

Core KPI definition

The page tracks one master KPI: effective cost per useful MW-month of compute. Useful means utilization-adjusted, not peak. Idle GPUs or data shuffling do not count as value.

How to read this

Adjust sliders, watch the tornado chart for dominant drivers, sanity check link budget headroom, and read the assumptions like an auditor. If launch cost or power price dominates, focus there before storytelling.

Inputs

System parameters


Model assumptions

Outputs

Economics and physics

Sensitivity tornado

Each bar shows how the master KPI moves when a single parameter shifts plus or minus ten percent.

LEO ⇄ drone ⇄ pond link budget

Simple RF budget: FSPL plus gains minus losses. Throughput uses Shannon capacity as a ceiling.

Cost model breakdown

Interpretation

The hybrid claim only holds if four constraints stay true together: utilization stays high, cooling stays controlled, the link has margin, and mass to orbit is justified by the monthly compute value. Use the tornado to see which driver dominates right now.

If launch cost or radiator mass dominates, reduce mass per useful compute. If power cost dominates, prioritize solar plus efficiency. If link margin is tight, lean on compression, caching, and edge aggregation to avoid over-promising throughput.